He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and treated others with contempt: “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee, standing by himself, prayed thus: ‘God, I thank you that I am not like other [...]
Archive for the ‘Theology’ Category
Inverted Phariseeism
Posted in Theology, tagged justification by faith alone, Phariseeism, Reformation Day, sola fide, solus christus on 31 October 2009 | 4 Comments »
Scripture or Science?
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged biblical inerrancy, biblical inspiration, evolutionary theory, historicity of Adam, scientific consensus, scientific evidence on 8 October 2009 | 6 Comments »
A commenter (Keith) on my earlier post on the historicity of Adam poses a good question:
Can you comment on the broader theological/hermeneutical/epistemological issues here?
Let’s assume the following for the sake of discussion: (a) there are strong textual (referring to the whole Bible) reasons in favor of a historical Adam; (b) the textual evidence isn’t a [...]
Objections? We’ve Adam!
Posted in Theology, tagged biblical inerrancy, hermeneutics, historicity of Adam on 22 September 2009 | 7 Comments »
My earlier post on the historicity of Adam has received some critical discussion on another blog. I appreciate the thoughtful push-back from Nick and others, not least because this is one of those debates that can quickly degenerate into anathematizing partisanship. I tried to address the matter objectively, without personalizing the issue, and I hope [...]
Was Adam a Real Historical Individual?
Posted in Theology, tagged biblical inerrancy, historicity of Adam, Tremper Longman on 21 September 2009 | 35 Comments »
In a video clip that will no doubt stir up some discussion in the evangelical blogosphere, Professor Tremper Longman III has expressed doubts about whether the opening chapters of Genesis commit one to believing that Adam was a real historical individual (in the sense that Jesus, say, was a real historical individual). I’m not going [...]
The Arminian Cause
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, petitionary prayer on 13 August 2009 | 5 Comments »
This post serves as a follow-up to my last post, in response to the comments that my new Arminian friend posted here (on-site) and then here (off-site). (Since he goes here by the username ‘Arminian1′, I will use that name below.) I’m not going to respond point-by-point to his second set of comments, because (i) [...]
Arminianism and the Paper Trail of Prophesied Prayers
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged Arminianism, backward causation, Calvinism, circular causation, divine foreknowledge, petitionary prayer on 6 August 2009 | 20 Comments »
This is a follow-up to my earlier post, in response to some comments.
To recap: on Justin Taylor’s blog, a commenter called ‘Arminian’ took issue with an article by John Piper by contending that Calvinism is incompatible with the claim that our prayers can be “genuine causes” of God’s decisions about how to answer those prayers. [...]
Piper on Predestined Prayers
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged Arminianism, Calvinism, John Piper, petitionary prayer on 29 July 2009 | 11 Comments »
Uber-blogger Justin Taylor recently posted an excerpt from an online article by John Piper in which he explains, by way of a fictional dialogue, how God’s foreordination of all things doesn’t imply that petitionary prayers are pointless. One commenter going by the moniker ‘Arminian’ took the opportunity to fire some shots over the fence. I [...]
Fallacy Files #4: False Dichotomy in the Baptism Debate
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged believer's baptism, credobaptism, false dichotomy, false dilemma, infant baptism, logical fallacies, paedobaptism on 14 July 2009 | 4 Comments »
The informal fallacy of false dichotomy (or false dilemma) is committed when two options are mistakenly or misleadingly presented as the only two possible or viable options. George W. Bush famously declared after 9/11, “You’re either with us or against us in the fight against terror.” Whatever the rhetorical merits of his statement, it was, [...]
TurretinFan Strikes Back
Posted in Philosophy, Theology, tagged Cornelius Van Til, dialetheism, paradox, TurretinFan on 8 July 2009 | 5 Comments »
A couple of months ago, I offered some criticisms of an argument given by TurretinFan against the claim that there are irresolvable paradoxes. (As a side note, it’s worth mentioning again that this claim can be understood in several different ways.) His argument was apparently aimed at paradoxes in general, not just theological ones.
TurretinFan has [...]
Anti-Sabbatarianism in the ESV Study Bible
Posted in Theology, tagged anti-sabbatarianism, ESV Study Bible, sabbath on 19 May 2009 | 6 Comments »
Let me preface this post by stating that I am a big fan of the ESV Study Bible. Sure, the relentless pre-publication hype eventually became rather tiresome, the superlatives used in some of the celebrity endorsements were faintly ridiculous, and I can’t help but wonder how anyone could in good conscience shell out $240 for [...]
